Providing a Practical Model of Gamification for Disease Prevention Education: A Qualitative Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Technology Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics and Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Today, gamification, as a new, attractive and efficient method, can transform disease prevention education. This method uses game elements, such as points, levels, challenges and rewards, to transform the learning process into an enjoyable and motivating experience. In this regard, the aim of this study is to present an applied gamification model for disease prevention education.
Method: This study was conducted within the framework of a qualitative approach and using a grounded theory method. In order to collect information, purposeful sampling was used with 22 experts, semi-structured interviews lasting between 30 and 40 minutes in the spring of 1402. Data coding was carried out in three stages: open coding, axial coding and selective coding, and MAXQDA2020 software was used for analysis.
Findings: The findings include the extraction of 462 open codes, 99 concepts, and 22 categories. The main category in this study is the application of gamification for disease prevention education.
Conclusion: The results of the study include providing of a practical gamification model, including causal conditions, central category, context, solution, intervening conditions, and consequences, which can be used to improve disease prevention education. The proposed solutions include: using incentives and rewards; creating attractiveness in the produced content; using modern technology; advertising and information; research and review; evaluation; Finally, it can be said that the use of these strategies in disease prevention education can significantly improve the health and well-being of society.
Keywords

  1. Kalogiannakis M, Papadakis S, Zourmpakis AI. Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature. Educ Sci. 2021;11(1):22.
  2. Zimmerling E, Höllig CE, Sandner PG, Welpe IM. Exploring the influence of common game elements on ideation output and motivation. J Bus Res. 2019;94:302–12.
  3. Burke B. Gamify: How gamification motivates people to do extraordinary things. Routledge; 2016.
  4. Cheng VWS. Recommendations for Implementing Gamification for Mental Health and Wellbeing. Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 7;11:586379.
  5. Ayres RL. Impact assessment in higher education: a strategic view from the UK, Inf Learn Sci 2018;119:94–100.
  6. Johnson S. Everything Bad is Good For You: Why Popular Culture is Making Us Smarter. London: Penguin, 2006.
  7. Gomes MF, y Piontti AP, Rossi L et al. Assessing the international spreading risk associated with the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak. PLoS Curr 2014;6.
  8. Kasurinen J, Knutas A. Publication trends in gamification: a systematic mapping study. Comput Sci Rev. 2018;27:33–44.
  9. Al-Rayes FA, AliAYaqoub A, Alfayez D, Alsalman F, Alanezi S, Alyousef H, et al. Ayres RL. Impact assessment in higher education: a strategic view from the UK. InfLearn Sci. 2018;119:94–100.
  10. Dicheva D, Dichev C, Agre G, Angelova G. Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educ Technol Soc. 2015;18:75–89.
  11. Robson K, Plangger K, Kietzmann JH, McCarthy I, Pitt L. Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Bus Horiz. 2015;58(4):411–20.
  12. feiffer CN, Jabbar A. Adaptive e-Learning: Emerging Digital Tools for Teaching Parasitology. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35(4):270–4.
  13. Messina JP, Kraemer MU, Brady O J et al. Mapping global environmental suitability for Zika virus. Elife 2016;5:e15272.
  14. Vancini RL, Russomano T, Andrade MS, de Lira CA, Knechtle B, Herbert JS. Gamification vs. Teaching First Aid: What Is Being Produced by Science in The Area?. Health Nexus. 2023;1(2):71-82.
  15. Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2008.
  16. Lee J. A grounded theory: integration and internalization in ERP adoption and use. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln; 2001.
  17. Aparicio AF, Vela FL, Sánchez JL, Montes JL. Analysis and application of gamification. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on interacción persona-ordenador 2012: 1-2.
  18. Riabko AV, Vakaliuk TA, Zaika OV, Kukharchuk RP, Novitska IV. Gamification method using Minecraft for training future teachers of computer science. InCEUR Workshop Proceedings 2024;. 22-35.
  19. Gonzalez-Argote J, Castillo-González W, Estevez JE. Update on the use of gamified educational resources in the development of cognitive skills. AG Salud. 2024;2:41-.
  20. Hardiyanti DY. The employment of gamification towards excellence in police services management. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. 2022;26(3):1643-50.
  21. Brito J, Vieira V, Duran A. Towards a framework for gamification design on crowdsourcing systems: The GAME approach. In2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations. IEEE. 2015; 13: 445-50.
  22. Meske C, Brockmann T, Wilms K, Stieglitz S. Soc Collab Gam. Gamification: Using game elements in serious contexts. 2017:93-109.
  23. Alloghani MA, Hussain A, Al-Jumeily D, Aljaaf AJ, Mustafina J. Gamification in e-governance: Development of an online gamified system to enhance government entities services delivery and promote public's awareness. InProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information and Education Technology. 2017; 10: 176-181.
  24. Harviainen JT, Hassan L. Governmental service gamification: Central principles. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy. Int J Innov Dig Econ. 2019;10(3):1-2.
  25. Krishnamurthy K, Selvaraj N, Gupta P, Cyriac B, Dhurairaj P, Abdullah A, Krishnapillai A, Lugova H, Haque M, Xie S, Ang ET. Benefits of gamification in medical education. Clin Anat. 2022;35(6):795-807.
  26. Alzghoul B. The Effectiveness of Gamification in Changing Health-related Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Open Public Health J. 2024; 17(1): 1-13.
  27. Kiselicki M, Blagoeva KT, Belshoska MM, Josimovska T. Technical infrastructure and tools for gamification in education. knowl Int J. 2023; 30;60(1):61-8.
  28. Božić AV, Hoić-Božić N, Stančin K. Technological Aspects of Gamification: Criteria for the Selection of Digital Tools and Platforms. InEuropean Conference on e-Learning 2024; 23(1): 538-541.
  29. Gerasimova IG, Oblova IS. https://ejce. cherkasgu. press. Europ J Contempo Edu. 2023;12(4):1244.
  30. Poliani A, Gnecchi S, Villa G, Rosa D, Manara DF. Gamification as an educational approach for oncological patients: a systematic scoping review. Healthcare. 2023; 11(24): 3116.
  31. Schiavo G, Roumelioti E, Deppieri G, Marconi A. Gamification Strategies for Child Protection: Best Practices for Applying Digital Gamification in Child Sexual Abuse Prevention. InProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference 2024; 282-289.
  32. Brull S, Finlayson S. Importance of gamification in increasing learning. J Contin Edu Nurs. 2016;47(8):372-5.

Szeto MD, Strock D, Anderson J, Sivesind TE, Vorwald VM, Rietcheck HR, Weintraub GS, Dellavalle RP. Gamification and game-based strategies for dermatology education: narrative review. JMIR Dermatol. 2021;4(2):e30325.